Very interesting, read Enneagrams a long time ago, but interesting correlation.
I do see this more as a dynamic vectors/ matrices, so I obviosuly don't subscribe to any form of static self-answered categorization (especialyl at still statistically low correlation).
But I do see how they can have higher correlation than Big Five (surprising to see higher than Jungian though).
Nice to see the evolution of the world modeling, Koshu. I feel like I'm in a very similar place.
This piece reminds me tangentially and directly of Cate Halls' enthusiasm for Enneagrams - are you familiar? https://usefulfictions.substack.com/p/there-are-nine-wolves-inside-of-you
Nice to hear similar oscillation Harold :)
Very interesting, read Enneagrams a long time ago, but interesting correlation.
I do see this more as a dynamic vectors/ matrices, so I obviosuly don't subscribe to any form of static self-answered categorization (especialyl at still statistically low correlation).
But I do see how they can have higher correlation than Big Five (surprising to see higher than Jungian though).